Whenever I’ve got a couple of weeks off from classes, I like to find a few things to read that take me away from the field of theology, since that’s what I’m reading during the school year. I typically pick up novels but I recently came across a great book of history. Here is the list of books that I have started to read. As always, I’ve bitten off more than I can chew and will read some or all of the following:
1. “Postwar” by Tony Judt (Penguin 2005). Begun as a response to the events of 1989, this book chronicles events in Europe after 1945. Judt takes advantage of the newly opened archives in Eastern Europe and Russia to tell a version of history that more adequately accounts for where we find ourselves now. I’m a chapter into it and have already been blown away by some of his insights.
I hate all these year-end lists. I also love them. The first couple I read were great: Roger Ebert’s ten best films of 2009, Pitchfork’s 25 best albums of the decade. I think it was right when I read Rolling Stone’s 100 best albums of the decade, however, that I started to realize just how much the lists are hokum. Bogus. I realized this first not through any logical process of thought, but through the waves of intellectual nausea that would overwhelm me anytime I saw another list advertised. (I kept hearing myself say, “I just vomited a little in my soul.”) So I have been trying to figure this out. What’s so bad about lists? Read the rest of this entry »
St. Peter Canisius, SJ (1521-1597), whose feast the universal Church celebrates today, is perhaps the most prosaic saint of the Catholic Church. He passed his adult life trudging from town to town, stoking the smoldering embers of the Catholic faith throughout Western Europe. Indeed, the continuing presence of the Catholic faith in both Austria and Bavaria owes much to his tireless labors: he founded 18 colleges, wrote 37 books, published a catechism that went through 200 printings, and threw himself into preaching and administration of the sacraments.
One aspect of St. Peter’s life that I continue to find comforting is the great spiritual harvest that God accomplished through his mediocre talent. Read the rest of this entry »
I have two questions for our readers based on recent developments.
The first question: Was the Nelson compromise in the Senate an acceptable one? Obviously it is not an ideal one. But there is never a case in politics where the ideal wins out. As far as I can tell, Nelson’s imput to the Senate passed bill allows states to decide whether federal subsidies for health care can be used on packages that include abortion coverage. In other words, it throws the issue back to the states, which is what overturning Roe vs. Wade would do anyway. Of course, this compromise means that there will be states where federal funds — your tax dollars — would indirectly fund abortions. However, it also means that many who do not have health coverage will receive it. Does the principle of double-effect apply here? Can we say that this is better than no reform at all?
Second question. Today Rev. Jerzy Popieluszko, the “Solidarity Chaplain,” was declared a martyr by Benedict XVI. He was killed by communist secret service in 1984. I think this is great of course. But it causes me to wonder: Why has Archbishop Romero not been similarly declared a martyr? And then my cynical side comes out and thinks: Is it because Jerzy was killed by left-wing fascists, but Romero by right-wing ones? Any thoughts?
Regina Spektor first gained some notice when she made a guest appearance on a forgettable Ben Folds song. She had a striking voice, but she made no great impact. What has propelled her to much greater attention has been her song “Laughing With.” It is a powerful song about God, and it led me to buy her new album, Far. What becomes clear from even a quick listen that she is blessed with a great voice and a sensibility that is as comfortable poking fun at 80’s music (the obvious “Dance Anthem of the 80’s”) as she is talking about the deep questions. Her fun stuff is everything you might want: catchy, engaging, and bubbly. But I want to pick apart two of her deepest songs to expose some of what I think is going on.
The first lines of “Laughing With” reflect the old saying, “There are no atheists in foxholes.” She twists the thought around laughter:
No one laughs at God in a hospital, / no one laughs at God in a war, / no one’s laughing at God when they’re starving or freezing or so very poor.
“The Road” is an Advent movie. It is about a child who carries the flame from an old world into a possible new world. It is about a child who is the word of his father, and his Father, if indeed there is a Father in a world that seems orphaned. As the father says early in the film: “If he is not the word of God, God never spoke.” Spoken about his son. And what father would not say the same? Yet we say it too as we prepare for Christmas, for this is what makes Christianity unique.
For anyone who has read Cormac McCarthy, the movie does not capture the book. McCarthy’s prose is too dense to be captured. Sometimes words can say more than images, to reverse the common cliche. But that being said, the movie captures much of the book, particuarly by retaining its iconography. Read the rest of this entry »
to serve as a soldier of God beneath the banner of the cross in our Society, which we desire to be designated by the name of Jesus, and to serve the Lord alone and the Church his Spouse, under the Roman pontiff, the vicar of Christ on earth, should, after a vow of perpetual chastity, poverty, and obedience, keep the following in mind." From the Formula of the Institute, 1540